CRITERIA 7 points each 6 points each 5 points each 4 points

CRITERIA
7 points each
6 points each
5 points each
4 points each
0-1 point each
DNP 805 Project
Presentation
Identifies the quality improvement initiative and quality plan in relation to your DNP scholarly project.
States the goal and measurable outcomes.
Identifies shareholders and responsibilities in conjunction with the quality of the DNP project.
Discusses how IPC impact the project
Employs a quality model, states how development, implementation, and evaluation of QI activities will occur.
Describe types of measure (dependent variables).
Include a diagram of the logic model.
State kinds of reliability and validity.
Identify benchmarks for your DNP projects and compare with national benchmarks
Explain the actions clearly and include timeframes for implementation/re-evaluation. Articulates how quality plan fits into strategic plan
Identifies the quality improvement initiative and quality plan in relation to your DNP scholarly project.
States the goal and measurable outcomes.
Identifies shareholders and responsibilities in conjunction with the quality of the DNP project.
Discusses how IPC impacts the project
Employs a quality model, states how development, implementation, and evaluation of QI activities will occur.
Describe types of measure (dependent variables).
Include a diagram of the logic model.
State kinds of reliability and validity.
Identify benchmarks for your DNP projects and compare with national benchmarks
Explain the actions clearly and include timeframes for implementation/re-evaluation. Articulates how quality plan fits into strategic plan
Vaguely identifies the quality improvement initiative and quality plan in relation to your DNP scholarly project.
States the goal. Outcomes may/may not be measurable.
Vaguely identifies shareholders and responsibilities in conjunction with the quality of the DNP project.
May or may not discuss how IPC impacts the project?
A quality model is employed, may/may not, state how development, implementation, and evaluation of QI activities will occur.
Types of measure (dependent variables) unclear.
Include a diagram of the logic model.
State kinds of reliability and/or validity.
Vaguely identifies benchmarks for your DNP projects and compare with national benchmarks
Explain the actions and include timeframes for implementation/re-evaluation. Vaguely articulates how quality plan fits into strategic plan
Vaguely identifies the quality improvement initiative and quality plan in relation to your DNP scholarly project.
Goal and/or outcomes not stated.
Vaguely identifies shareholders and responsibilities in conjunction with the quality of the DNP project.
May or may not discuss how IPC impacts the project?
A quality model is employed, may/may not, state how development, implementation, and evaluation of QI activities will occur.
Types of measure (dependent variables) unclear.
Diagram of the logic model incorrect.
State kinds of reliability and/or validity.
Vaguely identifies benchmarks for your DNP projects and compare with national benchmarks
Explain the actions and include timeframes for implementation/re-evaluation. Vaguely articulates how quality plan fits into strategic plan
Fails to identify the quality improvement initiative and quality plan in relation to your DNP scholarly project.
Goals and outcomes not stated.
Shareholders and responsibilities in conjunction with the quality of the DNP project not identified.
Does not discuss how IPC impacts the project.
Does not employ a quality model, or state how development, implementation, and evaluation of QI activities will occur.
Types of measure not described.
Diagram of the logic model not included.
Does not state kinds of reliability and validity.
Benchmarks for your DNP projects not identified
Actions not explained clearly; timeframes may be omitted. Does not articulate how quality plan fits into strategic plan
RUBRIC FOR PRESENTATION
The presentation is to be done using a Voicethread presentation. Brief introduction of yourself at the beginning. No more than a 25 to 30 minute presentation. References should be on the last slide(s). 76 % of total presentation grade
76% content + 24% presentation = 100%
RUBRIC FOR Voicethread PRESENTATION
The following grading rubric will be used to ensure a consistent standard for evaluating DNP student presentations =24% of total presentation grade.
Points
4
Points
3
Points
2
Points
1
Points
0
Score
Critical Thinking/Synthesis
Thoughtfully and accurately interprets results, shows in-depth under-standing of major ideas
Identifies relevant arguments, justifies results, offers reasons
Usually justifies results and offers reasons
Misinterprets data, gives unjustified arguments
Not present
Quality of Information
Covers topic thoroughly, includes details that support the topic in audio/video presentation
Includes essential information, includes some supporting details
Includes most essential information, details are somewhat sketchy
Lacks essential information
Not present
Organization
Well organized and coherent, topics are in logical sequence, includes clear introduction and conclusions
Organized, some topics are out of logical order, conclusions are generally clear
Some organization, topics jump around, conclusions are unclear
Not organized, topics make no sense
Not present
Grammar, Spelling and Visual Design
All grammar and spelling are correct; Slides are visually appealing, clean simple layout, text is limited to main bullet points & easy to read, graphics enhance under-standing of ideas; good use of color and space
One or two errors; Visually attractive, text is easy to read, colors enhance readability, graphics and special effects do not distract from under-standing
One or two errors; Text wordy & is sometimes hard to read, sometimes graphics or special effects distract from under-standing
Very frequent grammar and/or spelling errors; Text is very wordy & very difficult to read, layout is cluttered and confusing
Not present
Oral Presentation
Well prepared, speaks clearly, makes eye contact with audience, as appropriate if on video, delivers with ease, audio/speech is understandable ; details bullet/main points
Engages audience, fluid delivery, uses different approach other than simply reading screen,
Clear and understandable, uses limited delivery techniques
Not clear, not under-standable
Not present
APA/
References
APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero errors. Information is referenced as appropriate on slides
APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with one to two errors.
Three errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.
Four or greater errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.
Not present
Total Score and Comments: