Rubric Deliverable 1 Criteria A – 4 – Mastery B – 3

Rubric
Deliverable 1
Criteria
A – 4 – Mastery
B – 3 – Proficiency
C – 2 – Competence
F – 1 – No Pass
I – 0 – Not Submitted
Criterion 1
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough appraisal of valid sources of data in regards to sustainable energy, skilled labor, raw materials, utilities, and shipping conveyances.
75%
Elaborative appraisal of valid sources of data in regards to sustainable energy, skilled labor, raw materials, utilities, and shipping conveyances.
50%
Basic appraisal of valid sources of data in regards to sustainable energy, skilled labor, raw materials, utilities, and shipping conveyances.
25%
No appraisal of valid sources of data in regards to sustainable energy, skilled labor, raw materials, utilities, and shipping conveyances.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 2
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough discussion on the relationships between sustainable energy, skilled labor, raw materials, utilities and shipping conveyances for a manufacturing facility in the Atlanta area.
75%
Elaborative discussion on the relationships between sustainable energy, skilled labor, raw materials, utilities and shipping conveyances for a manufacturing facility in the Atlanta area.
50%
Basic discussion on the relationships between sustainable energy, skilled labor, raw materials, utilities and shipping conveyances for a manufacturing facility in the Atlanta area.
25%
No discussion on the relationships between sustainable energy, skilled labor, raw materials, utilities and shipping conveyances for a manufacturing facility in the Atlanta area.
0%
Not Submitted
Deliverable 1, Cont.
Criterion 3
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough evaluation of potential gaps or issues with identified datasets
75%
Elaborative evaluation of potential gaps or issues with identified datasets.
50%
Basic evaluation of potential gaps or issues with identified datasets.
25%
No evaluation of potential gaps or issues with identified datasets.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 4
0% of total grade
100%
Excel spreadsheet clearly shows all sources of data organized into datasets.
75%
Excel spreadsheet shows some sources of data organized into datasets.
50%
Excel spreadsheet shows a few sources of data organized into datasets.
25%
No Excel spreadsheet showing sources of data organized into datasets is submitted.
0%
Not Submitted
Deliverable 2
Criteria
A – 4 – Mastery
B – 3 – Proficiency
C – 2 – Competence
F – 1 – No Pass
I – 0 – Not Submitted
Criterion 1
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough identification of the needs and goals of the various stakeholder groups.
75%
Elaborative identification of the needs and goals of the various stakeholder groups.
50%
Basic identification of the needs and goals of the various stakeholder groups.
25%
No identification of the needs and goals of the various stakeholder groups.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 2
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough evaluation of the audience member’s background and skills.
75%
Elaborative evaluation of the audience member’s background and skills.
50%
Basic evaluation of the audience member’s background and skills.
25%
No evaluation of the audience member’s background and skills.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 3
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough definition of the motivating factors for audience participation in the presentation.
75%
Elaborative definition of the motivating factors for audience participation in the presentation.
50%
Basic definition of the motivating factors for audience participation in the presentation.
25%
No definition of the motivating factors for audience participation in the presentation.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 4
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough comparison and contrast of the desired outcomes of the visuals to be included in the presentation.
75%
Elaborative comparison and contrast of the desired outcomes of the visuals to be included in the presentation.
50%
Basic comparison and contrast of the desired outcomes of the visuals to be included in the presentation.
25%
No comparison and contrast of the desired outcomes of the visuals to be included in the presentation.
0%
Not Submitted
Deliverable 3
Criteria
A – 4 – Mastery
B – 3 – Proficiency
C – 2 – Competence
F – 1 – No Pass
I – 0 – Not Submitted
Criterion 1
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough listing of pertinent product features.
75%
Elaborative listing of pertinent product features.
50%
Basic listing of pertinent product features.
25%
No listing of pertinent product features.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 2
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough rating of ease of learning and use of the tool.
75%
Elaborative rating of ease of learning and use of the tool.
50%
Basic rating of ease of learning and use of the tool.
25%
No rating of ease of learning and use of the tool.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 3
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough presentation of cost information including subscription fees, hardware and software needs.
75%
Elaborative presentation of cost information including subscription fees, hardware and software needs.
50%
Basic presentation of cost information including subscription fees, hardware and software needs.
25%
No presentation of cost information including subscription fees, hardware and software needs.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 4
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough ranking of products in order of recommended implementation.
75%
Elaborative ranking of products in order of recommended implementation.
50%
Basic ranking of products in order of recommended implementation.
25%
No ranking of products in order of recommended implementation.
0%
Not Submitted
Deliverable 4
Criteria
A – 4 – Mastery
B – 3 – Proficiency
C – 2 – Competence
F – 1 – No Pass
I – 0 – Not Submitted
Criterion 1
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough addressing if biases exist in the sample presentations, including what leads to the assumption that biases are present.
75%
Elaborative addressing if biases exist in the sample presentations, including what leads to the assumption that biases are present.
50%
Basic addressing if biases exist in the sample presentations, including what leads to the assumption that biases are present.
25%
No addressing if biases exist in the sample presentations, including what leads to the assumption that biases are present.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 2
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough evaluation of the presentation materials, including ranking in order of degree of objectivity and bias.
75%
Elaborative evaluation of the presentation materials, including ranking in order of degree of objectivity and bias.
50%
Basic evaluation of the presentation materials, including ranking in order of degree of objectivity and bias.
25%
No evaluation of the presentation materials, including ranking in order of degree of objectivity and bias.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 3
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough suggestions for how each of the sample presentations could be improved to increase objectivity and reduce bias.
75%
Elaborative suggestions for how each of the sample presentations could be improved to increase objectivity and reduce bias.
50%
Basic suggestions for how each of the sample presentations could be improved to increase objectivity and reduce bias.
25%
No suggestions for how each of the sample presentations could be improved to increase objectivity and reduce bias.
0%
Not Submitted
Deliverable 5
Criteria
A – 4 – Mastery
B – 3 – Proficiency
C – 2 – Competence
F – 1 – No Pass
I – 0 – Not Submitted
Criterion 1
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough creation of a visualization of the qualitative survey findings.
75%
Elaborative creation of a visualization of the qualitative survey findings.
50%
Basic creation of a visualization of the qualitative survey findings.
25%
No creation of a visualization of the qualitative survey findings.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 2
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough application of appropriate visualizations for qualitative and quantitative data.
75%
Elaborative application of appropriate visualizations for qualitative and quantitative data.
50%
Basic application of appropriate visualizations for qualitative and quantitative data.
25%
No application of appropriate visualizations for qualitative and quantitative data.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 3
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough definition of both quantitative and qualitative data, explaining differences.
75%
Elaborative definition of both quantitative and qualitative data, explaining differences.
50%
Basic definition of both quantitative and qualitative data, explaining differences.
25%
No definition of both quantitative and qualitative data, explaining differences.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 4
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough identification of data found to be unavailable, provides an explanation of why it is not available.
75%
Elaborative identification of data found to be unavailable, provides an explanation of why it is not available.
50%
Basic identification of data found to be unavailable, provides an explanation of why it is not available.
25%
No identification of data found to be unavailable, provides an explanation of why it is not available.
0%
Not Submitted
Deliverable 6
Criteria
A – 4 – Mastery
B – 3 – Proficiency
C – 2 – Competence
F – 1 – No Pass
I – 0 – Not Submitted
Criterion 1
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough creation of the data links to sources that will develop appropriate insights.
75%
Elaborative creation of the data links to sources that will develop appropriate insights.
50%
Basic creation of the data links to sources that will develop appropriate insights.
25%
No creation of the data links to sources that will develop appropriate insights.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 2
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough construction of visualizations to highlight the key themes listed.
75%
Elaborative construction of visualizations to highlight the key themes listed.
50%
Basic construction of visualizations to highlight the key themes listed.
25%
No construction of visualizations to highlight the key themes listed.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 3
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough explanation of presentation and justification for data sets used.
75%
Elaborative explanation of presentation and justification for data sets used.
50%
Basic explanation of presentation and justification for data sets used.
25%
No explanation of presentation and justification for data sets used..
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 4
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough identification of data found to be unavailable, provides an explanation of why it is not available.
75%
Elaborative identification of data found to be unavailable, provides an explanation of why it is not available.
50%
Basic identification of data found to be unavailable, provides an explanation of why it is not available.
25%
No identification of data found to be unavailable, provides an explanation of why it is not available.
0%
Not Submitted
Deliverable 6 Cont.
Criteria
A – 4 – Mastery
B – 3 – Proficiency
C – 2 – Competence
F – 1 – No Pass
I – 0 – Not Submitted
Criterion 5
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough plan devised to turn insight into data into actions to meet company goals.
75%
Elaborative plan devised to turn insight into data into actions to meet company goals.
50%
Basic plan devised to turn insight into data into actions to meet company goals.
25%
No plan devised to turn insight into data into actions to meet company goals.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 6
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough explanation of what makes the insight actionable.
75%
Elaborative explanation of what makes the insight actionable.
50%
Basic explanation of what makes the insight actionable.
25%
No explanation of what makes the insight actionable.
0%
Not Submitted
Deliverable 7
Criteria
A – 4 – Mastery
B – 3 – Proficiency
C – 2 – Competence
F – 1 – No Pass
I – 0 – Not Submitted
Criterion 1
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough utilization of appropriate visualizations based on Tableau visualization options and audience needs.
75%
Elaborative utilization of appropriate visualizations based on Tableau visualization options and audience needs.
50%
Basic utilization of appropriate visualizations based on Tableau visualization options and audience needs.
25%
No utilization of appropriate visualizations based on Tableau visualization options and audience needs.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 2
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough creation of data sets to be used in the presentation.
75%
Elaborative creation of data sets to be used in the presentation.
50%
Basic creation of data sets to be used in the presentation.
25%
No creation of data sets to be used in the presentation.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 3
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough charting of the average, minimum and maximum temperatures and precipitation levels in the contiguous US.
75%
Elaborative charting of the average, minimum and maximum temperatures and precipitation levels in the contiguous US.
50%
Basic charting of the average, minimum and maximum temperatures and precipitation levels in the contiguous US.
25%
No charting of the average, minimum and maximum temperatures and precipitation levels in the contiguous US.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 5
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough application of proper visualizations for the qualitative data found on Greenhouse Gas Emissions website.
75%
Elaborative application of proper visualizations for the qualitative data found on Greenhouse Gas Emissions website.
50%
Basic application of proper visualizations for the qualitative data found on Greenhouse Gas Emissions website.
25%
No application of proper visualizations for the qualitative data found on Greenhouse Gas Emissions website.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 6
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough identification of the needs of the audience.
75%
Elaborative identification of the needs of the audience.
50%
Basic identification of the needs of the audience.
25%
No identification of the needs of the audience.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 7
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough explanation of presentation and justification for data sets used.
75%
Elaborative explanation of presentation and justification for data sets used.
50%
Basic explanation of presentation and justification for data sets used.
25%
No explanation of presentation and justification for data sets used.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 8
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough presentation of data using editorial thinking and communication.
75%
Elaborative presentation of data using editorial thinking and communication.
50%
Basic presentation of data using editorial thinking and communication.
25%
No presentation of data using editorial thinking and communication.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 9
0% of total grade
100%
Clear and thorough identification of data found to be unavailable with explanation of why it is not available.
75%
Elaborative identification of data found to be unavailable with explanation of why it is not available.
50%
Basic identification of data found to be unavailable with explanation of why it is not available.
25%
No identification of data found to be unavailable with explanation of why it is not available.
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 10
0% of total grade
Clear and thorough plan to turn insight derived from the data into actions to meet the communication goals
Elaborative plan to turn insight derived from the data into actions to meet the communication goals
Basic plan to turn insight derived from the data into actions to meet the communication goals
No plan to turn insight derived from the data into actions to meet the communication goals
0%
Not Submitted
Criterion 11
0% of total grade
Clear and thorough explanation what makes this insight actionable
Elaborative explanation what makes this insight actionable
Basic explanation what makes this insight actionable
No explanation what makes this insight actionable
0%
Not Submitted