Social Scientist Research Report/Reflection: Rubric Criteria Level 4 Level 3 Level 2

Social Scientist Research Report/Reflection:  Rubric
Criteria
Level  4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Knowledge / Understanding
-Key Questions-Goals-Research, Hypothesis, Thesis
Marks:10
-exceptional report that contains highly effective key questions, goals, research, hypothesis and thesis-each of above components are logically connected and relevant to society
-proficient report that contains effective key questions, goals, research, hypothesis and thesis-most of above components are logically connected and relevant to society
-adequate report that contains key questions, goals, research, hypothesis and thesis-some of above components are logically connected and relevant to society
-weak report that detail or accuracy in any of the following: key questions, goals, research, hypothesis and thesis-lack of logical connection and relevancy to  society
Thinking / Inquiry
-Interpretation of Data / Results-Conclusions
Marks:10
-Conclusion critically addresses and relates to the questions posed, hypothesis and observations-Rationale behind conclusion is clearly stated with exceptional supporting evidence.-data is well organized and easy to understand with visuals (graphs, charts etc.)-Student analyzes, information critically and concisely by including a theory/thorough rationale that explains observations
-Conclusion addresses and relates to the questions posed, hypothesis and observations-Rationale behind conclusion is clearly stated with supporting evidence.-data is organized and easy to understand with visuals (graphs, charts etc.)-Student analyzes, information proficiently
-Conclusion adequately addresses and relates to the questions posed, hypothesis and observations-Rationale behind conclusion is stated with some supporting evidence.-data is somewhat organized and but needs more visuals
-Conclusion lacks analysis that addresses and relates to the questions posed, hypothesis and observations with little supporting evidence.-poor analysis of data with little to no visuals
Communication
-Language Conventions-Clarity of Ideas
Marks;10
-Report is exceptionally clear, purposeful, logical and organized  and contains all steps of the social experiment-Excellent language conventions and use of academic language throughout the report
-Report is clear, purposeful, logical and organized -great use of language conventions and academic language throughout the report
-Report is somewhat purposeful, logical and organized -some errors in language conventions and need stronger academic language
-Report is lacks a clear purpose and is not always  logical and organized -numerous errors in language conventions and weak academic language
Application
-Methodology and Conducting of Experiment
Marks:10
-research report contains exceptional overview of the social experiment that is conducted professionally, ethically, free from bias and contains clear and concise instructions-report contains exceptional details on methodology,  rationale for key decisions, validation of steps and data, and showcases the meticulous care taken to record data that clearly address the key questions and hypothesis
-research report contains proficient overview of the social experiment that is conducted professionally, ethically, free from bias and contains clear instructions-report contains solid details on methodology,  rationale for key decisions, validation of steps and data, and showcases the care taken to record data that address the key questions and hypothesis
-research report contains an adequate overview of the social experiment that is conducted somewhat professionally, ethically, free from bias and contains instructions-report contains some details on methodology,  rationale for key decisions, validation of data
-research report lacks a clear overview of experiment that needs to be more professional. ethical-report needs more details on methodology,  rationale for key decisions, validation of steps and data,