Week 6 Assignment: Anatomy of Care: Janice – Reflection Paper Rubric Week

Week 6 Assignment: Anatomy of Care: Janice – Reflection Paper Rubric
Week 6 Assignment: Anatomy of Care: Janice – Reflection Paper Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVideo reflection: Review of key leaderships principles presented in the video presentation
20 to >17.8 pts
Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the key leadership principles covered in the video presentation.
17.8 to >14.4 pts
Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the key leadership principles covered in the video presentation.
14.4 to >11.8 pts
Identifies and demonstrates little understanding of the key leadership principles covered in the video presentation.
11.8 to >0 pts
Does not demonstrate an acceptable understanding of the key leadership principles covered in the video presentation.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVideo reflection: Application of the key principles learned in the video presentation
22.5 to >20.02 pts
Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the application of the key leadership principles covered in the video presentation.
20.02 to >16.2 pts
Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the application of the key leadership principles covered in the video presentation.
16.2 to >13.27 pts
Identifies and demonstrates little understanding of the application of the key leadership principles covered in the video presentation.
13.27 to >0 pts
Does not demonstrate an acceptable understanding of the application of the key leadership principles covered in the video presentation.
22.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics
5 to >4.45 pts
Writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness, includes thorough details, relevant data, and information, and is extremely well-organized. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are all correct, and there are no errors (0 errors).
4.45 to >3.6 pts
Writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors, includes sufficient details, relevant data, and information, and is well-organized. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are generally correct with few errors (1–2 errors).
3.6 to >2.95 pts
Writing lacks clarity or conciseness and contains numerous errors, provides insufficient detail, relevant data, and information, and lacks organization. Errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper (3–4 errors).
2.95 to >0 pts
Writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors, lacks detail, relevant data, and information, and is poorly organized. There are many distracting errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization (>4 errors).
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Guidelines
2.5 to >2.23 pts
Uses APA guidelines accurately and consistently to cite sources (0 errors). Sources are used and cited expertly and are peer-reviewed, relevant sources.
2.23 to >1.8 pts
Uses APA guidelines with minor violations to cite sources (1–2 errors). Sources are somewhat relevant but may be limited in scholarly nature.
1.8 to >1.48 pts
Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA guidelines (3–4 errors). Sources are not cited or cited with many errors. Sources are not scholarly in nature.
1.48 to >0 pts
Does not use APA guidelines. No scholarly research is evident, and does not meet the required number of sources.
2.5 pts
Total Points: 50
PreviousNext